Justice Jm Khazi Full Name Ritu Raj Awasthi, A Major Figure In Hijab Trial
As the breaking change of Hijab regulation in Karnata Schools was shared, Justice Jm Khazi Wikipedia has been constantly sought for.
A school uniform conflict arose in the Indian state of Karnataka in early January 2022.
When some Muslim students of a junior college who wished to wear hijab to lessons were denied admittance on the grounds that it was a breach of the institution’s uniform code.
Karnataka HC ruled that:
1. Wearing hijab is not an essential practice in Islam
2. Prescription of school/college uniform is a reasonable restriction that students can’t object.
A slap to PFI, CFI & all those who want to communalize educational institutes
Only Kitab, No Hijab
— Anshul Saxena (@AskAnshul) March 15, 2022
Justice Jm Khazi Wikipedia Explored
Ritu Raj Awasthi is available on Wikipedia however it does not seem Justice Jm Khazi is the short form of his name
Justice Jm Khazi is a college of Ritu Raj both of them have been involved in the controversial Hijab Ban in the state of Karnataka.
Ritu Raj Awasthi is a judge from India. He is now the Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court. He is a former Allahabad High Court Judge.
He was appointed Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court on October 9, 2021, and took his oath on October 11, 2021.
Karnataka High Court dismisses various petitions challenging a ban on Hijab in education institutions pic.twitter.com/RK4bIEg6xX
— ANI (@ANI) March 15, 2022
Karnataka Hijab Trial
A high court in India’s Karnataka state declared that the Hijab is not “essential” to Islam.
The decision follows a controversy in the state over the wearing of a headscarf.
Protests erupted in January when a government college barred Muslim females wearing the headscarf from entering.
The problem became out of control, causing Karnataka to close schools and institutions for many days.
To discourage demonstrations, the state administration barred mass gatherings and closed educational institutions in several districts on Monday, ahead of the ruling.
The case was heard by the Supreme Court after several Muslim women demonstrators filed petitions claiming that their freedom to wear headscarves was guaranteed by India’s constitution.
